روانشناسی سلامت

با همکاری مشترک دانشگاه پیام نور و انجمن روانشناسی اجتماعی ایران

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اخبار و اعلانات

زیست‌جهان معنای صمیمت زنان تاب‌آور ایرانی بهبودیافته از کرونا

مقالات آماده انتشار

نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکترای تخصصی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه علم و فرهنگ، گروه پژوهشی اشتغال و بازارکار موسسه پژوهشی نوآوری اجتماعی مهرپژوهان، تهران، ایران

2 استاد، گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.

3 استادیار، دانشکده علوم انسانی دانشگاه، علم و فرهنگ تهران، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه: صمیمیت توانایی شناخت خود در حضور دیگران با انگیزۀ اهمیت‌دادن به کیفیت درآمیختگی اجتماعی است. با توجه به نقش صمیمیت در سلامت روان، هدف پژوهش، واکاوی تجربه زیستۀ صمیمیت زنان تاب‌آور است.
روش: روش تحقیق مورد استفاده در این مقاله از نوع کیفی است. داده‌ها از 12 زن ایرانی با نمونه‌گیری هدفمند مبتنی برمعیار و مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختاریافته گردآوری شد. ابتدا زنان با نمرۀ تاب‌آوری بالاتر از 85 از مقیاس عوامل محافظتی-24 که از کرونا بهبودیافته تا سال 1402 بودند انتخاب و با آن‌ها مصاحبه شد. متن مصاحبه‌ها با روش پدیدارشناسی کلایزی در هفت مرحله تحلیل شد.
یافته‌ها: شرکت‌کنندگان این مطالعه، صمیمیت را در سه مضمون اصلی ارتباط عاطفی عمیق، تعامل فیزیکی و جنسی صمیمانه، تفاهم و هماهنگی در امور روزانه با 9 زیرمضمون و 95 کد اولیه معنا کردند و از راهبردهای مدیریت تعارضات و حل مساله، حفظ استقلال فردی در رابطه، انعطاف‌پذیری در مواجهه با تغییرات، حفظ تعادل کار و زندگی، حمایت اجتماعی، تقویت معنویت و ارزش‌های مشترک، شوخ‌طبعی و تفریح بهره می‌گرفتند تا به رضایت زناشویی، اعتماد و همدلی در رابطه، استقلال و توانمندی شخصی، ارتباط جنسی باکیفیت، مدیریت تعارضات، مشارکت در تصمیم‌گیری‌ها، امنیت روانی، فضای مثبت برای رشد فرزندان، شادی و رضایت از زندگی برسند. برای بررسی تایید پایایی فرآیند تحلیل از ضریب اعتبار «هولستی» استفاده شد.
نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج حاصل از تجارب زیسته معنای صمیمیت زنان تاب‌آور ایرانی بهبود یافته از کرونا در سه مضمون اصلی ارتباط عاطفی عمیق، تعامل فیزیکی و جنسی صمیمانه، تفاهم و هماهنگی در امور روزانه نشان دهندۀ نوع معنای صمیمیت آن‌ها در سه حیطۀ عاطفی جنسی و تفاهم و همدلی می‌باشد. از این یافته‌ها می‌توان در راستای توانمند‌سازی درمانگران و پژوهشگران زوج درمانی  بهره گرفت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Analyzing the Lived Experiences of Meaning of Intimacy Among Resilient Iranian Women Recovered from COVID-19

نویسندگان [English]

  • Pourandokht Niroumand 1
  • Mahnaz Aliakbari Dehkordi 2
  • Nazanin Abed 3
  • Ahmad Alipour 2

1 PhD., Department of Psychology, Humanities Faculty, University of Science and Culture, Labor Market and Employment, Mehrpajouhan Social Innovation Research Institute, Tehran, Iran.

2 Professor, Department of Psychology, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Humanities Faculty, University of Science and Culture, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Objective:  Intimacy is conceptualized as the capacity for self-awareness in the presence of others, driven by a motivation to cultivate meaningful social integration. Given its pivotal role in psychological well-being, this study aims to elucidate the lived experiences of intimacy among resilient Iranian women who have recovered from COVID-19. Method: Employing a descriptive phenomenological approach, Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 12 Iranian women after reaching theoretical saturation. The purposive sampling method is criterion-based to select individuals who have real-life experience with the phenomenon in question. Participants were women who had recovered from COVID-19 and scored above 85 on the SPF-24 resilience scale. Interview transcripts were analyzed using Colaizzi’s seven-step method include Familiarization, identifying significant statements, formulating meanings, clustering themes, Developing an Exhaustive description, Producing the fundamental structure, and Seeking verification of the fundamental structure. Results: The participants conceptualized intimacy through three main themes—deep emotional connection, intimate physical and sexual interaction, and mutual understanding and coordination in daily matters—along with nine subthemes and 95 initial codes. They employed strategies such as conflict management and problem-solving, maintaining individual autonomy within the relationship, adaptability to change, balancing work and life, social support, strengthening spirituality and shared values, humor, and recreational activities. These 




strategies contributed to outcomes including marital satisfaction, trust and empathy, personal autonomy and empowerment, high-quality sexual relations, effective conflict resolution, joint decision-making, psychological security, a positive environment for children's development, happiness, and overall life satisfaction. To verify the reliability of the analysis process, the Holst reliability coefficient, which is a formula for determining the reliability of nominal data in terms of the percentage of agreement observed between the main researcher and another coding researcher, was used. PAO (Percentage Agreement over Observations) For the first theme (deep emotional connection), it is 0.864, for the second theme (intimate physical and sexual interaction), it is 0.883, and for the third theme (mutual understanding and coordination in daily), it is 0.865 and for all three themes of this study, it is 0.870, which confirmed the reliability of the analysis process.




Conclusion: The results of the lived experiences of the meaning of intimacy of resilient Iranian women recovered from Corona in three subjects: 1) Deep Emotional Connection, comprising subthemes of emotional security, empathy and mutual understanding, and trust and honesty;2) intimate physical and sexual interaction comprising subthemes of satisfying and reciprocal sexual relations, affectionate and non-sexual touches, and maintaining personal and physical dignity and boundaries and  3) mutual understanding and coordination in daily matters including three sub-themes: cooperation in home and family affairs, effective interaction in decision-making, and effective conflict resolution indicative three type of intimacy is their emotional, sexual, understanding, and empathy. These findings can be used to empower therapists and couples therapy researchers and teaching marital relationship strategies used by these women, including constructive problem-oriented and emotion-oriented strategies such as "conflict management and problem solving" and "maintaining individual independence in the relationship", marital satisfaction, trust and empathy, personal independence and empowerment, quality sexual relationships, and a positive environment for children to grow.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Lived Experiences
  • Phenomenology
  • Resilience
  • Intimacy
  • COVID-19
  • Among Resilient Iranian Women
مراجع
Abedi, H. A. (2010). the application of phenomenological research in clinical sciences, strategy Quarterly, 54 (19), 207- 224 (in Persian) Doi: 20.1001.1.10283102.1389.18.1.6.1
Akbari Govabari, B., Forket, A., Alikhah, S., & Majidi, M. (2019). The role of social and psychological capital in predicting couples' marital intimacy, Journal of Social Psychology Research, 9(33), 95–114. (in Persian).
Aliakbari Dehkordi, M.  (2024). Construction, Validation and Standardization of Iranian Scale for Quality of Sexual-Marital Relationships (ISQSMR), Quarterly Journal of Health Psychology, 13(3): 135-154 (in Persian) https://doi.org/10.30473/hpj.2025.67397.5778
Alikhani, M., & Eskandari, H. (2014). Theorizing the process of coping with sexual disorders leading to marital conflicts based on Grounded Theory Approach, Research in Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences, 4(1), 1–12. (in Persian).
Berger, R. & M. Hannah. (1999). Preventive Approaches in couple’s therapy. Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203777916.
Broome, R.E. (2011). Descriptive Phenomenological Psychological Method: An Example of a Methodology Section from Doctoral Dissertation, Psychology, Philosophy, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916212X632934.
Butzer B, Campbell L.  (2008). Adult attachment, sexual satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction: A study of married couples. Pers Relatsh, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00189.x
Corkery, S. A., Curran, M. A., & Parkman, A. (2011). Spirituality, sacrifice and relationship quality for expectant cohabitors. Marriage and Family Review, 47(6), 345-362. doi:10.1080/01494929.2011.594213
Creswell. J.W. and Creswell, J.D. (2017) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th Edition, Sage, Newbury Park.
Davis, D., Shaver, P. R., Widaman, K. F., Vernon, M. L., Follette, W. C., & Beitz, K. (2006). "I can't get no satisfaction": Insecure attachment, inhibited sexual communication, and sexual dissatisfaction. Personal Relationships, 13(4), 465–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00130.x
Dijkstra, P., Barelds, D. P., Groothof, H. A., & Van Bruggen, M. (2014). Empathy in intimate relationships: The role of positive illusions. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 55, 477–482. DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12142.
Edalati, A. & Redzuan, M. (2010). A Review: Dominance, Marital Satisfaction and Female Aggression. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 162-166. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2010.162.166
Emami Sigaroodi, A., & Salsali, M. (2011). A comparative study of quantitative and qualitative research paradigms, Journal of Holistic Nursing And Midwifery, 21(2), 47–50. (in Persian).
Esmaili, S., Nikoogoftar, M., Yaghoobi, S., & Nazari, R. (2024). The Mediating Role of Coping Strategies and Resilience in the Relationship between Stressful Life Events and Positive and Negative Emotions in Women with Breast Cancer, Health Psychology,13(51), 21–36. (in Persian) https://doi.org/10.30473/hpj.2024.68222.5834
E'timadi, A., Amin Ja'fari, B., & Shah Seyah, M. (2014). The Impact of Collective Instruction of Couples Based on Relationship Therapy Approach on Increasing Marital Intimacy of the Couples of Shahid Families of the City of Isfahan, The Islamic Journal of Women and the Family, 2(4), 13. (in Persian).
Fehr, B. (1996). Friendship processes. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Finstad, G. L., Giorgi, G., Lulli, L. G., Pandolfi, C., Foti, G., León-Perez, J. M., Cantero-Sánchez, F. J., & Mucci, N. (2021). Resilience, Coping Strategies and Posttraumatic Growth in the Workplace Following COVID-19: A Narrative Review on the Positive Aspects of Trauma. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(18), 9453. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189453.
Fiorello, M. D. (2011). Aspects of intimacy with God in the book of Job. Journal of Spiritual Formation & Soul Care, 4(2), 155-184. DOI:10.1177/193979092011004002004
Gonczarowski, Y. A., Nisan, N., Ostrovsky, R., and Rosenbaum, W. (2019). A stable marriage requires communication, Gamesand Economic Behavior,118(c),626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2018.10.013.
Habibi, A., Keshavarz, S., & Kakavand, A. (2024). Relationships between affective control with marital adjustment: the mediating role of marital intimacy, Journal of Women and Family Studies, 12(1), 10–31.(in Persian). Doi: 10.22051/jwfs.2024.43410.2975
Harris, V. W., Skogrand, L., & Hatch, D. (2008). Role of friendship, trust, and love in strong Latino marriages. Marriage & Family Review, 44(4), 455-488. DOI:10.1080/01494920802454041
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Cambridge University Press; Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.
Holland, K. J. (2015). The Effects of Spiritual Intimacy on Relational Intimacy and Well-Being. A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy, Loma
Holland, K. J., Lee, J. W., Marshak, H. H., & Martin, L. R. (2016). Spiritual intimacy, marital intimacy, and physical/psychological well-being: Spiritual meaning as a mediator. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 8(3), 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000062
Hosseinzadeh, M., Ghasemi Niaei, F., Haghani Zemydani, M., & Esmaeily 4, M. (2023). The Lived Experiences of Families with High-risk Groups During the Corona Era, Health Psychology, 12(45), 21–42. (in Persian). https://doi.org/10.30473/hpj.2023.61706.5412
Jamieson, L. )2011), Intimacy as a Concept: Explaining Social Change in the Context of Globalization or Another Form of Ethnocentrisms? Sociological Research Online, 16 (4) 15, DOI: 10.5153/sro.2497
Karimi, R. Bakhtiyari, M. & Masjedi Arani, A (2019). Protective factors of marital stability in long-term marriage globally: a systematic review. Epidemiol Health, 41. DOI: 10.4178/epih.e2019023
Khabazi, M., kimiaee, S.A., kareshki, H., & Mashhadi, A. (2022). The Evaluation of the structural equation model of factors affecting on marital intimacy in newlywed couples, Research in Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences, 22(1), 83–102. (in Persian) https://doi.org/10.22051/jcbsr.2022.11582
Khojastehmehr, R., Fallahi Khoshknab, M., Hajjari, S., & Sodani, M. (2017). Parenting after divorces: A qualitative study, Journal of Research in Behavioral Sciences, 15(48), 239–256. (in Persian). https://doi.org/10.1001.1.17352029.1396.15.2.13.4
Kim, H. (2017). Empathy in the early childhood classroom: Exploring teachers ‘perceptions, understanding and practices. A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy.
Miller, L. and Fishkin, S. (1997) On the Dynamics of Human Bonding and Reproductive Success: Seeking a “Windows” on the “Adapted for” Human-Environmental Interface. In: Simpson, J. and Kenrick, D.T., Eds., Evolutionary Social Psychology, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 197-236.
Mitchell, A., Castellani, M. A., Herrington, L.R., Josheph, J., Doss, D. B., & Snyder, K. D. (2008). Predictor of intimacy in couples’ discussions of relationship injuries: An observational study. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(1), 21-29. DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.22.1.21
Mostafa, V., FalahZadeh, H., Amerehei Borcheloei, S., & Hamidi, O. (2021). The Mediating Role of Resilience in the Relationship between Dyadic Perfectionism and Emotional Divorce in women, Quarterly Journal of Social-Psychological Studies of Women, 66(1), 185–218. (in Persian) https://doi.org/10.22034/jssw.2021.14917
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Collins, N. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 641–666. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.641.
Niroumand, P., Ali Akbari Dehkordi, M., Abed, N., & Alipour, A. (2024). Validation and reliability Scale of Protective Factors In a sample of Iranian working population: Technical and Vocational Education Organization, Quarterly Journal of Skill Training, 49(3), 7–34. (in Persian).
Nurhayati, S. R., Faturochman, F., & Helmi, A. F. (2019). Marital quality: A conceptual review. Bulletin Psychology, 27(2), 109-124. DOI: 10.22146/buletinpsikologi.37691.
Olson, D., DeFrain, J. (2003). Marriages and Families: Intimacy, Diversity, and Strengths. Boston: McGrow Hill; 100-5. https://doi.org/03601271003608902/10/1080
Parsakia, K., Farzad, V., & Rostami, M. (2023). The mediating role of attachment styles in the relationship between marital intimacy and self-differentiation in couples. Applied Family Therapy Journal (AFTJ), 4(1), 589-607. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.aftj.4.1.29.
Piravi Vanak, M. (2019). Phenomenology, "way" of thinking and research, The Journal of Philosophical Investigations, (127), 1–15. (in Persian) https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2019.28780.2061.
Ponce-Garcia, E., Madewell, A., & Kenni, S. (2015). The Development of the Scale of Protective Factors: Resilience in a Violent Trauma Sample،. Violence and Victims, 30(5). DOI: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-14-00163
Reyhani, R., Sodani, M., FarhadiRad, H., & Khojastehmehr, R. (2022). Identifying the Components of Marital Intimacy in Stable Marriages: Based on the Grounded Theory, The Journal of Modern Psychological Researches, (119), 1–20. (in Persian) https://doi.org/ 10.22034/jmpr.2022.14917
Rodríguez-González M, Bell CA, Pereyra SB, Martínez-Díaz MP, Schweer-Collins M, Bean RA (2023) Differentiation of self and relationship attachment, quality, and stability: A path analysis of dyadic and longitudinal data from Spanish and U.S. couples. PLoS ONE 18(3): e0282482. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282482
Settegast, S. (2024). What is sexual intimacy? Think, 23(67), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/S 1477175623000489.
Shahmoradi, B., Golmohammadian, M., & Hojatkhah, M. (2024). Analyzing the Lived Experiences of Nurses in the Corona Department of Kermanshah Hospitals on Coping with Job Burnout, Health Psychology, 13(49), 7–20. (in Persian) https://doi.org/10.30473/hpj.2024.66762.5725
Somayyeh Esmaili, S., Nikoogoftar, M., Yaghoobi, M., Nazari, R. (2024). The Mediating Role of Coping Strategies and Resilience in the Relationship between Stressful Life Events and Positive and Negative Emotions in Women with Breast Cancer, Quarterly Journal of Health Psychology, 13(3): 21-36 (in Persian) https://doi.org/10.30473/hpj.2024.68222.5834
TenHouten, W. D. (2007). A General Theory of Emotions and Social Life. New York, NY: Routledge.
Venter, N. (2009, February). Resilience In Intimate Relationship. University Of South AFR.
Villatte, M., Jennifer L. V., Hayes, S.C. (2015). Mastering the Clinical Conversation: Language as Intervention. New York City: The Guilford Press., https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agaa030
Wilcox, W.B., & Nock, S.L. (2006). Commitment to marriage, emotional engagement key to wives’ happiness. Social Science Research 37(3):828-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.11.001
Zakeri, F, Rezae, M. (2022). The Role of Alexithymia and Dysfunctional Reactions in Predicting Marital Intimacy, Practice in Clinical Psychology,10(4): 329-342. (in Persian). DOI: 10.32598/jpcp.10.4.850.1.
روانشناسی سلامت

مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده
انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 20 خرداد 1405
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار