F
Fatemeh Beheshtian; Hasan Ahady; Nila Akhondy; Adis kraskian Mojembari
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to the Comparison Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Stress Inoculation Trainingon Psychological capitalin Infertile women. Method: The research method was applied in terms of purpose and in terms of data collection, a quasi-experimental design ...
Read More
Objective: The purpose of this study was to the Comparison Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Stress Inoculation Trainingon Psychological capitalin Infertile women. Method: The research method was applied in terms of purpose and in terms of data collection, a quasi-experimental design with pretest-posttest design with control group. The statistical population of this study included all infertile women of Kish Island. Using a available sampling method, 45 infertile women were considered as the sample size in two experimental groups (each group of 15) and control (15 subjects). The experimental groups underwent acceptance and commitment therapy (9 sessions 90 minutes) and Stress Inoculation Training(10 sessions 90 minutes), but the control group received no treatment. To collect data, the Luthans Psychological capitalQuestionnaire (2007) was used. Data analysis was performed using SPSS-v22 software in two sections: descriptive and inferential (covariance analysis).Result: The results showed that both of the interventions used in this study can significantly improve the psychological capital and its components (hope, optimism, self-efficacy and resiliency) in infertile women (p <0.05), But the Stress Inoculation Traininghas a greater impact on the improvement of psychological capital and its components.Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, acceptance and commitment therapy and stress inoculation trainingare effective interventions in increasing the psychological capital of infertile women But the effect of the Stress Inoculation Trainingrelief was greater.
A
Farideh Heshmati; Nila ElmyManesh; Rasoul Heshmati
Volume 6, Issue 24 , March 2018, , Pages 120-137
Abstract
Objective:There is evidence of a relationship between mind and body about pain. The aim of this study was to study the structural relations among chronic pain, mindfulness and behavioral activation and inhibition systems.Method:The present research is descriptive-correlative, retrospective, and cross-sectional.In ...
Read More
Objective:There is evidence of a relationship between mind and body about pain. The aim of this study was to study the structural relations among chronic pain, mindfulness and behavioral activation and inhibition systems.Method:The present research is descriptive-correlative, retrospective, and cross-sectional.In this research from 300 students, 166 students with chronic pain from the Payam-E-Noor University of Tehran were selected by voluntary and available sampling. McGill pain questionnaire, and five-facet mindfulness scale and behavioral activation and inhibition systems scale were used as research tools for data collection.Data were analyzed using correlation and structural equation. Results:The results showed that the hypothesized model fit is good and acceptable. Behavioral Activation System has a direct and negative effect on pain) β=0/38) and behavioral inhibition system direct and positive effect on pain) β=0/36). The Behavioral Activation System through the mediation of mindfulness has an indirect effect on pain and behavioral inhibition system through mindfulness has an indirect effect on pain.Conclusion: It can be concluded that behavioral activation and inhibition systems and mindfulness important determinants of pain.
