A
nazafarin Paknahad; majid saffarinia
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction on perceived stress, negative mood, self-efficacy, and pain perception in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Method: This was a quasi-experimental study with pre-test and post-test with control ...
Read More
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction on perceived stress, negative mood, self-efficacy, and pain perception in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Method: This was a quasi-experimental study with pre-test and post-test with control group. The statistical population of this study included all patients with rheumatoid arthritis referred to Tehran Shariati hospital. A sample of 40 patients (20 females and 20 males) was selected with targeted sampling from this population and were randomly assigned into experimental (10 male and 10 female) and control (10 male and 10 female) groups. In this intervention, the experimental group underwent mindfulness-based stress reduction program during 8 sessions for 2 months, 2 hours per week, and the control group was placed on the waiting list. The experimental and control groups also completed the Perceived Stress Scale by Cohen et al (1983), the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale by Lovibond & Lov bond (1995), the Self-efficacy Scale by Sherer et al (1982), and the McGill pain questionnaire by Melzack (1975) at pre-test and post-test. Multivariate analysis of covariance was used to analyze the data. Findings: The results showed that in the post-test phase, mindfulness-based stress reduction treatment significantly (p<0/001) increased self-efficacy and significantly (p<0/001) reduced perceived stress, negative mood, and pain perception in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Conclusion: Mindfulness-based stress reduction can be effective in increasing self-efficacy and decreasing perceived stress, negative mood, and pain perception in these patients.
ُSeyed Ali Musavi Asl; SADEGH PAROOIE
Abstract
Objective: positive psychology is a scientific approach with a focus on strengths instead of weaknesses, building the good in life instead of repairing the bad. Therefore, the present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of positive psychotherapy. Orientation on sense of coherence, self-efficacy, ...
Read More
Objective: positive psychology is a scientific approach with a focus on strengths instead of weaknesses, building the good in life instead of repairing the bad. Therefore, the present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of positive psychotherapy. Orientation on sense of coherence, self-efficacy, psychological well-being and resilience was performed in nurses. Method: This study was an experimental study with pre-test-post-test design with control and follow-up group. 30 Nurses were selected through convenient sampling. Subsequently, the participants were randomly divided into two groups of 15 people. The experimental group received positive psychology training whereas the control group did not receive any treatment. Both groups were evaluated before and after the intervention and in the follow-up stage through Antonsky Coherence Questionnaire, Connor and Davidson Resilience Scale, Reef Psychological Welfare Questionnaire and General Self-Efficacy Scale.The Data were analyzed using repeated measure (ANOVA). Findings: The results of analysis showed that positive psychology training led to a significant increase in resilience, psychological well-being and sense of coherence in nurses. The results of follow-up test also showed that this method has enough stability and sustainability. However, no significant difference was observed between the intervention and control groups regarding self-efficacy. Conclusion: According to the findings of this study, positive psychology interventions can be used to promote sense of coherence, psychological well-being and resilience in nurses.
hassan Shafiei; Shadi Nasiri
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of the present research was to prediction the quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes based on psychological well-being, health literacy and self-efficacy. Method: This study was a descriptive correlational study. The statistical population of this study consisted of all ...
Read More
Objective: The purpose of the present research was to prediction the quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes based on psychological well-being, health literacy and self-efficacy. Method: This study was a descriptive correlational study. The statistical population of this study consisted of all diabetic patients referring to diabetes clinic of Imam Sadegh Hospital in Delijan City in 1396. The research sample consisted of 150 patients with type 2 diabetes who were selected by random sampling method. The data for the research were collected through Quality of life Test (WHOQOL-BREF), Psychological well-being Test, Health Literacy for Iranian Adults & Diabetes Management Self-efficacy Scale. Pearson correlation and multiple regression analysis were used to analyze the data. Findings: Data analysis showed that 59% of the quality of life of diabetic patients is predictable by psychological well-being (β = 0.59, p = 0.001), health literacy (β =0.42, p=0.001) and Self-efficacy (β=0.34, p= 0.001). Conclusion: Health literacy, psychological well-being and self-efficacy in diabetes management play an important role in increasing the quality of life of patients with type 2 diabetes, and this finding has important implications for the education and promotion of mental health in diabetic patients.
Mina Moghtaderi; Majid Saffarinia; Hossein Zare; Ahmad Alipour
Abstract
Objective: The emergence of chronic diseases such as Parkinson seriously damages the patients’ psychological health besides physical health. Therefore, the present study was conducted with the purpose of investigating effectiveness of the package of hope therapy based on positivist approach on ...
Read More
Objective: The emergence of chronic diseases such as Parkinson seriously damages the patients’ psychological health besides physical health. Therefore, the present study was conducted with the purpose of investigating effectiveness of the package of hope therapy based on positivist approach on Self-efficacy and loneliness of patients with Parkinson. Method: The present study was quasi-experimental with pretest, posttest, control group and two-month follow-up period. The statistical population of the present study included the people with Parkinson in the city of Isfahan in the winter of 2018-19. 40 patients with Parkinson were selected through non-random available sampling and were randomly replaced into experimental and control groups (20 patients in the experimental group and 20 in the control group). The experimental group received training intervention of hope therapy based on positivist approach in ten ninety-minute sessions during three months. The applied questionnaires in this study included Self-efficacy (Sherer and Adams, 1994) and loneliness questionnaire (Russell, 1996). The data from the study were analyzed through repeated measurement ANOVA. Findings: The results showed that the training package of hope therapy based on positivist approach has significant effect on Self-efficacy and loneliness of Parkinson patients (p<0/001). However, this effect on the follow-up was also maintained. Conclusion: The findings of the present study showed that training package of hope therapy based on positivist approach can lead to the improvement of Self-efficacy and loneliness of Parkinson patients due to enjoying the methods of hope therapy and positivist psychotherapy.
A
samera hoseini; Jaber Davoodi; Mojtaba Habibi; Richard Fielding
Volume 3, Issue 12 , December 2015, , Pages 70-83
Abstract
ـ (1389). فصلنامه بیماریهای پستان، مرکز تحقیقات سرطانپستان جهاد دانشگاهی علوم پزشکی تهران، شماره 1.##
American Cancer Society, (2008), “Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines”.##American Cancer Society, (2011), ...
Read More
ـ (1389). فصلنامه بیماریهای پستان، مرکز تحقیقات سرطانپستان جهاد دانشگاهی علوم پزشکی تهران، شماره 1.##
American Cancer Society, (2008), “Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines”.##American Cancer Society, (2011), Last Medical Review.##American Cancer Society, (2012).##Anderson, G. L. &Clebowski, R. T. & Aragaki, A. K. et al. (2013), “Conjugated equine oestrogen and breast cancer incidenceand mortality in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: extended follow-up of the Women’s Health Initiative randomized placebo-controlled trial”.##Bandura, A. (1997), “Self-efficacy towards a unifying theory of behavioral change”, PsycholRev, 8(191- 215).##Bandura, A. (1985), “Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory”, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.##Bandura, A. (1997), “Self-efficacy. HarvMent Health Lett”. New York, NY: Academic Press, 13(9), 40- 49.##Bandura, A. (1997), “Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control”, New York: Freeman.##Bandura, A. (1977), “Social Learning Theory”, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.##Chery, D. K., Burt, C. W. &Woodwell, D. A. (2003), “National ambulatory medical care survey: Advance data from vital health statistics”,National center for Health statistics.##El-Tamer, M. B., Ward, B. M., &Schifftner, T. (2007), “Morbidity and mortality following breast cancer surgery in women: national benchmarks for standard of care”, Ann Surg, 245, 665- 671.##Fisher, B., Costantino, J.P. &Wickerham, D.L. & et al. (2005), “Tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer: current status of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study” , J Natl Cancer Inst, 97:1652–1662.##Harcourt, D. (2007), “Quality of Life in Post-Mastectomy Radiotherapy” , Advances in Breast Cancer, 4, 1- 8.##Health Organization’s International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health, Rehabilitation Oncology, (2010), Vol. 28, No. 3.##Hynes, D. M, Weaver, F., & Morrow, M. (2004), “Breast cancer surgery trends and outcomes: results from a National Department of Veterans Affairs study”, J Am CollSurg; 198: 707- 716.##InsanaFisher, P. T., & Howell, D. (2010), “The Power of Empowerment: An ICF-Based Model to Improve Self-Efficacy and Upper Extremity Function of Survivors of Breast Cancer”, Rehabilitation Oncology, 28, 17- 19.##Lam, W. T. (2002), “Is self-efficacy a predictor of short-term post-surgical adjustment among Chinese women with breast cancer?”, 16, 651- 659.##Lam, W. T., Chan, M., Hung W. K., & Fielding, R. (2007), Psycho-Oncology , 16: 904- 912.##Lam, W. T., Chan, M., Hung W. K., & Fielding, R. (2009), Psycho-Oncology, 18: 1189–1198 .##Luszczynska, A., Gutiérrez-Doña, B., &Schwarzer, R. (2005), “ General self-efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries”, International Journal of Psychology, 40, 80-89.##Merluzzi, T. V., Nairn, R. C., Hegde, K., Martinez Sanchez, M. A., & Dunn, L. (2001). Self‐efficacy for coping with cancer: revision of the Cancer Behavior Inventory (version 2.0). Psycho‐Oncology, 10(3), 206-217.##National Breast Cancer Organization (formerly Breast Cancer Network of Strength), (2009).##Rogers, L. Q., Courneya, K. S., Verhulst, S., Markwell, S., Lanzotti, V., & Shah, P. (2006). Exercise barrier and task self-efficacy in breast cancer patients during treatment. Supportive care in cancer, 14(1), 84-90.##Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). “Generalized self-efficacy scale”. Measures in Health Psychology: A User’s Portfolio. Causal and ControlBeliefs, 35- 37.##Stopeck, A. T., Lipton, A. et al. (2012), “Denosumab Compared With Zoledronic Acid for the Treatment of Bone Metastases in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study” , J ClinOncol, 18, 112- 146##Vilholm, O. J., Rasmussen, L. &Sindrup, S. H. (2008), “The postmastectomy pain syndrome: An epidemiological study on the prevalence of chronic pain after surgery for breast cancer”, 99, 604- 610##
A
mohamad narimani; mohammad bagiyankoulemarz; Behnaz Mehdinejad moghadam
Volume 4, Issue 13 , February 2015, , Pages 7-20
Abstract
Objective: The present study aims to compare irrational beliefs, self-efficacy, and psychological well-being in healthy individuals and patients with migraine headaches. This study is a cross-sectional-comparative post event. Method: The statistical universe of this research includes all men and women ...
Read More
Objective: The present study aims to compare irrational beliefs, self-efficacy, and psychological well-being in healthy individuals and patients with migraine headaches. This study is a cross-sectional-comparative post event. Method: The statistical universe of this research includes all men and women suffering from migraine headaches, and all healthy men and women in Ardabil in 1390 (A.H). The subjects were 30 patients suffering from migraine headaches referred to psychological, neurological, and brain clinics selected by convenience sampling method, as well as 30 healthy people selected by cloning method (based on age, education level, and social-economic status). To collect data, the questionnaires of irrational beliefs, self-efficacy, and psychological well-being were used. Result: The results of multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and correlational coefficient showed that there was a significant difference between the two groups "Migraine sufferers and Healthy people" in terms of three variables of "self-efficacy, irrational beliefs, and psychological well-being" in the level of P≥0.01. Conclusion: The results showed that most psychological problems had their roots in irrational thoughts and beliefs about self, others and the world around. In other words, irrational beliefs in migraine patients cause stress and anxiety in their life, and much more difficulties in matters concerning life.