روانشناسی سلامت

با همکاری مشترک دانشگاه پیام نور و انجمن روانشناسی سلامت

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اخبار و اعلانات

مقایسه امیدواری و تمایلات رفتار جامعه‌پسند در سطوح مختلف پیامدهای مثبت بیماری سرطان

نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی عمومی، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

2 کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی عمومی، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران.

3 کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی بالینی، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، کرمان، ایران.

4 کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی بالینی، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

مقدمه: بیماری­های جسمانی همچون سرطان علاوه بر پیامدهای منفی می ­توانند پیامدهای مثبتی را نیز موجب گردند که تحت عنوان پیامدهای مثبت بیماری شناخته می­ شوند. مطالعه حاضر با هدف مقایسه امیدواری و تمایلات رفتار جامعه ­پسند در سطوح مختلف پیامدهای مثبت بیماری سرطان صورت گرفت. روش: در این مطالعه علی-مقایسه­ ای، جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل بیماران مبتلا به سرطان بیمارستان­های شهر رشت (ناحیه یک) در سال 1398 بودند که ازاین‌بین، 200 نفر با روش نمونه­ گیری در دسترس انتخاب گردیدند. به‌منظور جمع­ آوری داده­ها، از پرسشنامه چشم ­انداز امیدوارانه (سودرگرن و هایلند، 2000)، مقیاس امیدواری (اسنایدر و همکاران، 1991) و مقیاس تمایلات رفتاری جامعه ­پسند (بامستیگر و سیگل، 2019) در انتها، تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده­ها با استفاده از روش تحلیل واریانس چند متغیری انجام گرفت. یافته‌ها: گروه بیماران مبتلا به سرطان با سطوح بالا پیامد مثبت بیماری در مقایسه با گروه بیماران مبتلا به سرطان با سطوح پایین پیامد مثبت بیماری، نمرات بالاتری در امیدواری و تمایلات رفتار جامعه­ پسند کسب کردند. نتیجه‌گیری: با توجه به یافته­ های پژوهش، گروه بیماران مبتلا به سرطان با سطوح بالا پیامد مثبت بیماری، امیدواری و تمایلات رفتار جامعه ­پسند بیشتری دارند. ازاین‌رو، ارائه مداخلاتی برای افزایش پیامدهای مثبت بیماری سرطان می ­توانند به افزایش امیدواری و تمایلات رفتار جامعه ­پسند منجر گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparison of Hope and Prosocial Behavior Intentions in Different Levels of Positive Consequences of Cancer Illness

نویسندگان [English]

  • Reza Shabahang 1
  • farzin bagheri sheykhangafshe 2
  • Marzieh Shahryari Sarhadi 3
  • Adeleh Yousefi Siahkoucheh 2
  • Vahid Hajialiani 4

1 M.A in General Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 M.A in General Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.

3 M.A in Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.

4 M.A in Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Objective: Physical illnesses such as cancer, in addition to negative consequences, can also have positive outcomes that are known as positive consequence of illness. The aim of this study was to compare hope and prosocial behavior intentions in different levels of positive consequences of cancer illness. Method: In this causal-comparative study, the population of the study consisted of cancer patients in hospitals in Rasht city (District 1) in 2019, of which 200 patients were selected by convenience sampling. For collecting data, Silver Lining Questionnaire (Sodergren & Hyland, 2000), Hope Scale (Snyder et al., 1991), and Prosocial Behavioral Intention Scale (Baumsteiger & Siegel, 2019) were used. Finally, the data were analyzed by multiple analysis of variance method. Findings: The group of cancer patients with high level of positive consequences of illness got higher scores in hope and prosocial behavior intentions in comparison to group of cancer patients with low level of positive consequences of illness. Conclusion: According to the findings, the group of cancer patients with high level of positive consequences of illness have higher hope and intentions for prosocial behaviors. Hence, providing interventions to increase the positive consequences of cancer can lead to increased hope and prosocial behavior intentions.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Positive Consequences of Illness
  • Hope
  • Prosocial Behavior Intentions
  • Cancer Illness
مراجع
کرمانی، زهرا؛ خداپناهی، محمد کریم؛ و حیدری، محمود. (1390). ویژگی­های روان­سنجی مقیاس امید اسنایدر. روان­شناسی کاربردی، 5(3)، 23-7.
Affieck, G. & Tennen, H. (1996). Construing benefits from adversity: Adaptational significance and dispositional underpinnings. Journal of Personality, 64, 899-922.
Affleck, G., Tennen, H., Croog, S., & Levine, S. (1987). Causal attributions, perceived benefits, and morbidity after a heart attack: An 8-year study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 29-35.
Aldwin, C. M., Sutton, K. J., & Lachman, M. (1996). The development of coping resources in adulthood. Journal of Personality, 64, 837-871.
Anderson, K. A. (2018). Post-traumatic growth and resilience despite experiencing trauma and oppression. Journal of Family Social Work, 21(1), 1-4.
Antoni, M. H., Lehman, J. M., Kilbourn, K. M., Boyers, A. E., Culver, J. L., Alfer, S. M., ..., Carver, C. S. (2001). Cognitive-behavioral stress management intervention decreases the prevalence of depression and enhances benefit finding among women under treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Health Psychology, 20(1), 20-32.
Baumsteiger, R., & Siegel, J. T. (2019). Measuring prosociality: The development of a prosocial behavioral intentions scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101(3), 305-314.
Blackie, L. E. R., & Cozzolino, P. J. (2011). Of Blood and Death: A Test of Dual-Existential Systems in the Context of Prosocial Intentions. Psychological Science, 22(8),998-1000.
Bower, J. E., Kemeny, M. E., Taylor, S. E., & Fahey, J. L. (1998). Cognitive processing, discovery of meaning, CD4 decline, and AIDS-related mortality among bereaved HIV-seropositive men. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 979-986.
Bride, O. M. C., Dunwoody, L., Lowe-Strong, A., & Kennedy, S. M. (2008). Examining adversarial growth in illness: The factor structure of the silver lining questionnaire (SLQ-38). Psychology & Health, 23(6), 661-678.
Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Cozzolino, P. J. (2006). Death contemplation, growth, and defense: Converging evidence of dual-existential systems? Psychological Inquiry, 17(4), 278-287.
Cozzolino, P. J., Staples, A. D., Meyers, L. S., Samboceti, J. (2004). Greed, death, and values: from terror management to transcendence management theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(3), 278-292.
Cruess, D. G., Antoni, M. H., McGregor, B. A., Kilbourn, K. M., Boyers, A. E., Alferi, S. M., ..., Kumar, M. (2000). Cognitive-behavioral stress management reduces serum cortisol by enhancing benefit finding among women being treated for early stage breast cancer. Psychosomatic Medicine, 62(3), 304-308.
Dirik, G., & Göcek-Yorulmaz, E. (2018). Positive sides of the disease: Posttraumatic growth in adults with type 2 diabetes. Behavioral Medicine, 44(1), 1-10.
Dong, M., Van Prooijen, J., Wu, S., Zhang, Y., Jin, S. (2019). Prosocial attitudes toward money from terror management perspective: Death transcendence through spirituality. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 29(1), 1-17.
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., and Spinrad, T. (2006). “Prosocial development,” in Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 3, Social, Emotional, and Personality Development, 6th Edn, Vol. ed. N. Eisenberg; Series eds W. Damon and R. M. Lerner (New York: Wiley), 646–718.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior research methods, 39(2), 175-191.
Folkman, S. (2010). Stress, coping, and hope. Psycho-Oncology, 19, 901-908.
Fraizer, P. A., & Kaler, M. E. (2006). Assessing the validity of self-reported stress-related growth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 859–869.
Futamura, I. (2018). Is extraordinary prosocial behavior more valuable than ordinary prosocial behavior? PLos ONE, 13(4), e0196340.
Grace, J. J., Kinsella, E. L., Muldoon, O. T., & Fortune, D. G. (2015). Post-traumatic growth following acquired brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontier in Psychology, 6, 1162.
Hefferon, K., Grealy, M., & Mutrie, N. (2009). Post-traumatic growth and life threatening physical illness: a systematic review of the qualitative literature. British Journal of Health Psychology, 14(2), 343-378.
Helgeson, V. S., Reynolds, K. A., & Tomich, P. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of benefit finding and growth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(5), 797-816.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1988). The ecology of stress. New York: Hemisphere.
Joseph, S., & Butler, L. D. (2010). Positive changes following adversity. PTSD Research, 21(3).
Joseph, S., & Linley, P. A. (2005). Positive adjustment to threatening events: An organismic valuing theory of growth through adversity. Review of General Psychology, 9(3), 262-280.
Knafo-Noam, A., Uzefovsky, F., Israel, S., Davidov, M., Zahn-Waxler, C. (2015). The prosocial personality and its facets: genetic and environmental architecture of mother-reported behavior of 7-year-old twins. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 112.
Lannie, A., & Peelo,-Kilroe, L. (2019). Hope to hope: Experiences of older people with cancer in diverse settings. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 40, 71-77.
Levi, O., Liechtentritt, R., & Savaya, R. (2012). Posttraumatic stress disorder patients' experiences of hope. Qualitative Health Research, 22(12), 1672-1684.
Linley, P. A., & Joseph, S. (2004). Positive change following trauma and adversity: a review. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17(1), 11-21.
Lurhans, F., & Jensen, S. M. (2002). Hope: A new positive strength for human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 1(3), 304-322.
Mc Bride, O., Dunwoody, L., Lowe-Strong, A., & Kennedy, M. (2008). Examining adversarial growth in illness: The factor structure of the silver lining questionnaire (SLQ-38). Psychology and Health, 23(6), 661-678.
Meichenbaum, D. (1985). Stress inoculation training. New York: Pergamon.
Moreno, P. I., & Stanton, A. L. (2013). Personal growth during the experience of advanced cancer: a systematic review. The Cancer Journal, 19(5), 421-430.
Park, C. L., Cohen, L. H., & Murch, R. L. (1996). Assessment and prediction of stress related growth. Journal of Personality, 64, 71-105.
Petrie, K. J., Buick, D. L., Weinman, J., & Booth, R. J. (1999). Positive effects of illness reported by myocardial infarction and breast cancer patients. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 47(6), 537-543.
Redlich-Amirav, D., Ansell, L. J., Harrison, M., Norrena, K. L., & Armijo-Olivo, S. (2018). Psychometric properties of Hope Scales: A systematic review. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 72(7), e13213.
Rousseau, P. (2000). Hope in the terminally ill. Western Journal of Medicine, 173(2), 117-118.
Scheier, M. F., Weintraub, J. K., & Carverm C. S. (1986). Coping with stress: divergent strategies of optimists and pessimists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1257-1264.
Schiavon, C. C., Marchetti, E., Gurgel, L. G., Busnello, F. M., & Reppold, C. T. (2017). Optimism and hope in chronic disease: A systematic review. Frontier in Psychology, 7, 2022.
Snyder, C. R. (Ed.). (2000). Handbook of hope: Theory, measures, and applications. San Diego: Academic Press.
Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T., ..., Harney, P. (1991). The will and the ways: development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 570-585.
Sodergren, S. C., & Hyland, M. E. (2000). What are the positive consequences of illness? Psychology & Health, 15(1), 85-97.
Sodergren, S. C., Hyland, M. E., Singh, S. J., & Sewell, L. (2002). The Effect of Rehabilitation on Positive Interpretations of Illness. Psychology & Health, 17(6), 753-760.
Taylor, S. E. (1983). Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation. American Psychologist, 38, 1161-1173.
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.
Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1996). The post-traumatic growth inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9, 455-471.
Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Post-traumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 1–18.
Updegraff, J. A., & Taylor, S. E. (2000). From vulnerability to growth: Positive and negative effects of stressful life events. In J. H. Harvey & E. D. Miller (Eds.), Loss and trauma: General and close relationship perspectives (pp. 3-28). New York, NY, US: Brunner-Routledge.
World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194.
روانشناسی سلامت
دوره 9، شماره 33
اردیبهشت 1399
صفحه 95-112
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار